Drugs to Assist Mental Illness:To Treat or Not toTreat
77Mental Illness and Medicine
Modern
drugs can cure and manage many of today's diseases, but are they more
of a problem than a solution? In the novel One
Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest readers are forced to look at
a system of medicine that was created to cure people of their
disease, and make us second guess our methods after the main
character, McMurphy loses his identity from treatment. After every
commercial that advertises a new wonder drug there is a quick follow
up listing of all the possible side effects, which can include heart
attack, stroke, or even the more plain approach of saying death. If
these drugs are such a miracle, then why are there so many people
that still suffer from diseases? Is an attempt to cure someone be
worth the risk? As a current psychology major I decided this essay
would be a good time to check it out. Obviously this is a horribly
broad subject, so I decided to research drugs that were used in
mental institutions such as the Camarillo State Mental Hospital, and
were mentioned in One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest.
Possibly
the first drug ever created to cure the mentally ill was
Chlorpromazine. Chlorpromazine is
an incredibly strong depressant still commonly used to cure
Schizophrenia, severe Manic-Depression, and severe behavioral
problems in children. It is also used to treat nausea , vomiting,
anxiety before surgery, chronic hiccups, acute intermittent
Porphyria, and symptoms of Tetanus. It was, and still is widely
accepted as a drug that may be used to return the mentally ill back
into society. Obviously the plus side of this drug is phenomenal, and
it almost seems too good to be true. Unfortunately, as with most
things in life, it is. Firstly the drug says stop it immediately if
you start twitching uncontrollably. That should be enough to give
you a second thought about any sort of drug. Side effects also
include heart failure, sudden death, or Pneumonia in older adults
with Dementia-related conditions. Is the chance of heart failure,
death, and pneumonia worth the chance of curing a mental illness?
Obviously
Chlorpromazine was only one of the original cures in battling mental
illness, so there are many more modern drugs. Antidepressants as a
whole are being used more and more in modern psychology, so I felt
they would be appropriate to add to this list. Before I get started
on the subject of antidepressants I feel I should point out the fact
that before any resource I read said anything about the drugs they
stated antidepressants are not a cure, and sometimes the side effects
can be worse than the benefits. From the very beginning I could tell
this was not going to be pretty. Firstly, nobody really knows with
absolute certainty what causes depression. Many scientists have a
very strong idea, but the actual cause of depression is yet to be
proven despite what the antidepressant commercials want you to
believe. Drug companies seem to enjoy sugar coating things, because
there is no solid number as to how many people are actually cured by
antidepressants. Every source has different numbers, but the average
seems to be around half the people that take up to two different
antidepressant drugs end up symptom free.
Seems like pretty decent results right? I thought so too until I
read the downsides of these drugs. Many who take the drugs and
become cured slip right back into depression immediately after being
taken off of them. Unless you have severe depression, most doctors
suggest exercise, or self-help strategies since they seem to be more
effective than the drugs. Side effects tend to be quite common, and
many of them are significant enough for people to come off the drugs
once they notice them. There are so many different types of
antidepressants that it is virtually impossible for me to list them
all, but the most common side effects include sexual problems,
drowsiness, sleep difficulties, nausea, fatigue, weight gain,
nervousness, dry mouth, and blurred vision. The risk of suicide also
highly increases. With only around a fifty percent success rate is
it worth taking an antidepressant that increases your risk of
suicide?
Fortunately, or perhaps unfortunately depending on your opinion on
the subject, drugs are not
the
only means of curing patients of illnesses. Our hero McMurphy was a
tough dude. Drugs obviously could not even phase our hero. Instead
he was dehumanized by more dramatic means, so lets talk about one of
the more severe and dark subjects. In One
flew over the Cookoo's Nest all
of the patients feared the electro shock therapy, or more
specifically Electroconvlusive Therapy, or ECT for short. ECT in
modern day is used only as a last resort to cure severe Major
Depression, Schizophrenia, Mania, and Catatonia which has not reacted
to any other means of treatment. Most modern countries highly frown
upon the treatment and discourage it if at all possible, but a few
other countries such as India still use it more freely. Essentially
they electroshock someones brain with the same power as a cellphone
battery can produce in varying ways depending on what it is they are
trying to cure, and force their body into electrically induced
seizures for therapeutic results. Sixty to seventy percent of people
given ECT are at least temporarily cured, though many people relapse
over time.
Contrary to what the media wants you to believe, people who receive
ECT treatments are very rarely forced. Many volunteer because they
believe the side effects to be worth curing their depression. As
many as one million people in the US receive ECT treatments every
year. Many of these people have stated that the ECT has been given a
bad name by the media, and it is actually very safe. Due to the fact
that many states do not require mental hospitals to report anything
about the patients who have been forced into ECT, there is no solid
number as to how many people are given ECT against their will. Every
source I found via website or otherwise simply said that very few
people are ever forced into receiving treatment. Most of these
people were diagnosed with severe depression and needed treatment so
as to avoid being a danger to themselves or others.
Before we go into the side effects I need to make it very clear that
ECT is usually voluntary, and only forced once all other options have
been exhausted. It is a last resort to save someones life.
Somewhere between thirty-five and forty percent of people given ECT
suffer from a significant loss of intelligence, and virtually everyone given treatment suffer from
various forms of amnesia. It seems that
in a desperate attempt to cure mental illness they very well may be
causing more or worse problems. Even as a last resort I personally believe amnesia is a very high
price to pay to be “cured.”
Lastly we get to talk about what really destroyed our hero McMurphy.
Lobotomies were originally developed as a way to tame dogs, and
became widely accepted. As time went on Psychologists then tested on
chimps as a means of making them better behaved, and eventually moved
on to using them on humans. By removing the frontal lobe of the
brain it was believed that an unruly person could cured and become a
fully functional member of society without suffering from a loss of
memory. Unfortunately slicing open someones head to remove a part of
their brain proved too tedious, and left scars. A new method was
developed where they essentially took an ice pick and shoved it into
the lower part of someones eye, and swished around to disconnect the
frontal lobe from the rest of the brain. This surgery became so easy
it became performed alarmingly frequently.
Tens of thousands of people were given lobotomies before real
research could be done. People who underwent the procedure
frequently came out like zombies, unable to show any emotion of joy,
sadness or enthusiasm. Around the year 1950 people realized one out
of three people given lobotomies were actually cured, which turns out
to be the same number of people who would get better on their own
without the procedure. Many countries completely banned the
procedure after all the research had been done. In the United States
it eventually became “experimental” and is still carried on
today, just on a much smaller scale.
While I was researching lobotomies I came across a curious number
which I stated above. One out of three people get better on their
own? Is that a real number? What is the range of diseases that cure
themselves, and how often does it occur across the board?
Unfortunately, after hours of research I came up empty handed as far
as the specifics, but the number itself proved true. One out of
three
people with mental illnesses get better on their own. On this note I decided to delve further into the subject. What can
cause someone to be cured of a mental illness without taking any
medication? Many sources had countless different “cures,” but
the
most common of which included exercise, being outdoors, and eating
right. All of which can stimulate the body and mind allowing chemical
imbalances and deficiencies to fix themselves. The best part is
there are no side effects to eating right and exercise.
Unfortunately this does not cure everything, and in many cases it
just alleviates symptoms. However since proper diet and exercise is
overall good for your health, I believe it should be a starting point
for any treatment.
Everything comes at a cost. No matter what drug is taken, or what
method is used to assist with a mental illness there are risks
involved. Unfortunately, sometimes people have no choice. As much
as I would love to say drugs should be avoided at all costs, in the
year 2004 suicide ranked as the 11th highest cause of
death in the US. As a last resort I believe drugs should be used to
save lives, but if there is any way to pull through without them I
believe they should be avoided.
Drugs do not always cure diseases, nor do they even always help.
Sometimes they make the very thing you are trying to cure worse,
cause new problems, or cause death. I can not speak for everyone who
has taken drugs and been cured, but I personally do not find them
worth the risk.
Reference Page
Benson, L. "Minnesota man fights forced electroconvulsive therapy." Psych Observer. 22 Apr 2009 <http://badpsych.com/2008/12/16/minnesota-man-fights-forced-electroconvulsive-therapy/>.
Burgher, Valerie. "Electroconvulsive therapy's return stirs debate on use." Shocking Treatment. 22 July, 2001. 22 Apr 2009
Hasslberger, S. "Nutrients Cure 'Mental Illness' - Orthomolecular Psychiatry." 07 October 2005. 22 Apr 2009 <Nutrients Cure 'Mental Illness' - Orthomolecular Psychiatry>.
"History of the Lumbotomy." Angelfire. 22 Apr 2009 <http://www.angelfire.com/fl2/flamingDruid2/History.html>.
Multum, C. "chlorpromazine." Drugs.com. 22 Apr 2009 <http://www.drugs.com/mtm/chlorpromazine.html>.
"What You Need to know About Depression Medication." Helpguide. 22 Apr 2009 <http://www.helpguide.org/mental/medications_depression.htm>.
Yeglesias, J. "Controversial Psychosurgery Resulted in a Nobel Prize." http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/articles/moniz/index.html. 22 Apr 2009
<http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/articles/moniz/index.html>.







Larry Fields Level 6 Commenter 12 months ago
Old saying: It's the dose that makes the poison. It's my understanding that non-wealthy schizophrenics are usually given anti-psychotic drug doses that are too high. Why? There are at least two reasons.
First titrating the medication dose for a given individual requires more of a psychiatrist's time, and is more expensive than simply going by established guidelines with respect to dosage.
The second consideration is 'defensive medicine'. A titrated daily dose is a bit too high on some days, just right on most days, and a bit too low on other days. Theoretically, a schizophrenic patient could become unglued on one of the too-low days, and do serious damage to himself, or to other people's property. Then the psychiatrist would be vulnerable to a lawsuit. The dosage that's optimal for the patient is smaller than the dose that optimal for the psychiatrist's bottom line.
Ironically, the 'defensive medicine' approach has an unintended consequence: Patients taking excessive doses feel terrible, are more likely to go off their meds entirely, and are more likely to inadvertently harm themselves or cause property damage than patients taking the sustainable titrated doses. So much for skimping on publicly-funded psychiatric care.